Garry Burns and The New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal
And The New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal
"Garry" and the tribunal appear to be mincing around New South Wales, declaring that any person who criticises "Gay Activists" "Mardi Gras" or who makes any connection between Homosexual men and drug dealing, debauchery or makes any reference to homosexual men traveling to Russia, Thailand and other countries for the purpose of buying a baby with the express intention of torturing and raping that child, to be guilty of "Vilification" which is a "Hate Crime" in Australia.
This is to despite the fact that, internationally, concerns are being raised about the latest spat of "Gay Pride" parades which have proved to be sleazy, debauched, unsavory affairs with, perhaps most worryingly of all very young children being seen in attendance, apparently accompanied by adults dressed in sado masochist leather wear. Boys as young as 8 were videoed dancing "in a sexually charged manner" cheered on by scantily clad homo sexual men. People are appalled that homosexual men are behaving, in public in a manner which would be a crime for a heterosexual person and encouraging young children to behave in a manner which would cause serious concerns and a visit from the relevant authorities if the "parents" were a heterosexual couple.
The fact of the matter is that Homosexual men. "Gay Activists" from New South Wales, Australia have been convicted, in America of going to Russia, buying a baby for cash, taking him back to New South Wales where they tortured and raped the baby for years, with their friends, taking videos, all the while using the child to play the "Homosexual family" poster boys. Yet in New South Wales one may not debate or discuss a serious matter that clearly must be talked about openly. One may not criticise or "vilify" homosexual men. One may not debate the terrible events that have occurred. One may never, never feel the right to express concern that a minority of homosexual people seem to have the right to dictate what people say, particularly, of course what comments one makes on the World Wide Webb.
John Sunol's problems with The New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal began as far back as 2005 when he was taken before the Tribunal for the crime of
"Vilification - Homosexual" John Sonul had the temerity to write, online:
(a) ‘Homosexuality is a behavioural disorder, brought on by the social conditioning (brain washing) of human beings, through group and peer pressure.
e.g. gay/lesbian/bi = sin
sin = eternal separation from God
eternal separation from God = death.’
(b) ‘The Gay and Annual Lesbian Mardi Gras, One big blight upon the city. This is the ultimate of all evil and it is unknowingly run by criminal gang members and potential terrorists.’
(d) ‘I have spoken out sharply against the Gay Lobby and feminist lefttist social changes which are anti-God and out to destroy todays society. This includes,
Same sex partners Marriage:
Adoption for homosexual couples:
Decriminalised drugs, Mariuajana and Heroine ect:
and other such evils.’
(e) ‘Faggots are all wicked evil people.’
(f) ‘I am willing to go to prison for being dissobedient to any law of such and I will incite others to do so as well.’
(g) ‘The Mardi Gras is full of Criminals and run by drug lords. It is also full of Child pedeophiles and corrupt people.’
(h) ‘God will burn Sydney to the Ground because of the evilness of these fags.’
(i) ‘I hope and pray that God mooves and brings more of the religious right into Australia to keep the poofs and faggs kept held down.’"
John Sonul denies having written items (e) and (i).
We are told the criteria for the crime of "Vilification - Homosexual is:
49ZT(1) It is unlawful for a person, by a public act, to incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, a person or group of persons on the ground of the homosexuality of the person or members of the group.
49ZT(2) Nothing in this section renders unlawful:
(a) a fair report of a public act referred to in subsection (1), or (b) a communication or the distribution or dissemination of any matter comprising a publication referred to in Division 3 of Part 3 of the Defamation Act 1974 or which is otherwise subject to a defence of absolute privilege in proceedings for defamation, or (c) a public act, done reasonably and in good faith, for academic, artistic, religious instruction, scientific or research purposes or for other purposes in the public interest, including discussion or debate about and expositions of any act or matter.
Excellent, John Sonul is rendered safe because his online comments in various forums, chats and You Tube videos were clearly expressed to initiate debate concerning the organised selling of drugs, child abuse and other criminal acts that he had concerns about. The duty and right of any concerned citizen one would have thought. No profanity, no personal remarks and no personal details given out. Quite reasonable, perhaps, given the general nature of the World Wide Webb where profanity, personal remarks, and private details being given out often obscure debate. Clause C, Safe as Houses.
But No !
The case is upheld and John Sunol. The New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal attempts to justify their decision by declaring:
"REASONS FOR DECISION
The nature of these proceedings
1 In these proceedings, the Applicant, Mr Henry Collier, alleges that material published by the Respondent, Mr John Sunol, on the internet during October 2004 vilified homosexual people contrary to provisions of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (‘the AD Act’).
2 According to Mr Collier, Mr Sunol published this material in two ways: by including it in material published on websites controlled by him and by contributing it to websites controlled by others. All the websites involved were accessible to the general public without a password.
3 The orders that Mr Collier seeks from the Tribunal are that Mr Sunol must (a) remove from all websites controlled by him all material relating to homosexuals, homosexuality or the Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras; (b) refrain from publishing material on these topics on any website, whether or not it is controlled by him; (c) post an apology for his prior publication of material vilifying homosexuals on every website that is controlled by him, or on which he has previously published any material; and (d) pay Mr Collier’s costs.
4 Mr Sunol asserts that some of the material claimed to have been published by him was in fact put on the relevant website by other people. He admits that he himself published the rest of the material, but says that this material did not contravene the AD Act for two reasons. These are (a) that it did not vilify homosexual people and (b) that it was published reasonably and in good faith for purposes in the public interest, and therefore fell within an exception to the prohibition against homosexual vilification in the AD Act.
5 On 25 October 2004, Mr Collier lodged with the Anti-Discrimination Board the complaint that gave rise to these proceedings. A conciliation conference held on 16 December 2004 was unsuccessful. On 10 March 2005, at Mr Collier’s request, the President of the Anti-Discrimination Board referred the complaint to the Tribunal."
Gosh ! My only advice to the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal is never, never, never mince, waddle or fart your way into a public house in Old South Wales where vilification may well proceed meet and greet. One wonders at such a strange decision, clearly designed in 2005 to stifle public debate. The cases against John Sonul mount up he is called before the Tribunal again and again, in 2006, 2008, 2009, 2012 (three times) 2014 (Seven times), Three times so far in 2015, with three more to go. With the threat of prison in his case with "Garry Burns" and The New South Wales Civil and Administrative tribunal today. (3/09/15). One can only imagine how John Sunol has lived through this harassment?
In the case on the 25 July 2015 John Sunol is accused of:
Complaint 1: 1410195
Complaint 2: 1410218
Complaint 3: 1410717
Yes Indeed! John Sunol is to answer to The New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal and to "Garry Burns" for linking to a website that conveys the message that homosexual men are child molesters. Here is a link to a site that conveys the message that homosexual men are child molesters much better than John Sunol ever could.
"Garry Burns" claims that John Sunol has victimised him by publishing a statement claiming he is corrupt, I feel sure "Garry Burns" is corrupt he is slippery as a greased faggot. I may get away with saying that, for now, because I do not live in New South Wales. We know however that "Garry Burns" has fwends with international connections. The usual suspects.